A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place improvement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such locations are topic to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly constructed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they had been intended to Obtain visual proof with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few simply just looking to create a loved ones dwelling in René Collier and Paul Feely accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a situation that a lot of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty diverse Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily truth from the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains uncertain. The courtroom ought to identify whether or not the wall as built complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Specific Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and scheduling disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside each other extensive once the authorized expenses happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.